- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 11:26:37 -0700
- To: François REMY <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com>
- Cc: Zack Weinberg <zackw@panix.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 10:24 AM, François REMY <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com> wrote: >> > <td class="shift"><div>content</div></td> >> > <td class="skew"><div><div>content</div></div></td> >> > >> > I don't really care *how* CSS enables me to get rid of those vacuous > >> > divs, >> > but I think it definitely *should* be possible to do the styling I want >> > without them. >> >> For this to *actually* work correctly, it needs special-case handling, >> which has been discussed in the past with approval. > > (I think that what Tab means is that instead of requesting a way to make the > hack less ugly, it's actually better to get the hack unnecessary in the > first hand, which is what the CSSWG seems to have agreed on; Tab please > correct me if I understood you the wrong way) Yes, I'm talking about an explicit "table-header-angle" property or whatever, to solve this use-case explicitly. This use-case can't be handled generically with the "make transforms affect geometry" proposal that we'll add at some point. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 1 May 2013 18:27:24 UTC