- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:52:15 -0800
- To: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr> wrote: >> Le 30/01/2013 05:16, Tab Atkins Jr. a écrit : >>> Okay, should be fixed now. If a } occurs in a selector or an at-rule >>> prelude, it changes behavior based on whether you're currently parsing >>> a top-level rule or not, usually throwing the rule away. >> >> This is minor, but I think an unpaired } (so only for top-level rules) >> should be consistent with an unpaired ] or ). If they are preserve tokens, >> just append them to a selector/prelude. If not, let "consume a primitive" >> fail and handle that. > > Hmm, that's a good point. I think I'd prefer to just make them all > syntax errors. I guess I'll bite the bullet and make "consume a > primitive" capable of failing. Done. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 31 January 2013 21:53:06 UTC