- From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 20:31:23 -0700
- To: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CACQ=j+cRYEWdiUxi1vOS9oYCFMgKJmn_rssxkcKV0MZ2FStCXQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr> wrote: > Le 30/01/2013 00:30, Glenn Adams a écrit : > >> >> * EOF in selector mode should be a parse error (a {} block is missing) >> * EOF in at-rule prelude should be like ';'. A parse error for >> declarations-filled or rule-filled at-rules, but not for other >> at-rules: >> >> data:text/html,<style>@import "data:text/css,body{__** >> background:green" >> >> >> In the example above the @import rule is valid even though it ends >> with EOF rather than ';' >> >> >> I would not agree this is valid. Rather, its operation depends on >> interoperable error handling behavior. >> > > Indeed, the above @import rule is invalid per the CSS 2.1 core grammar, > but I believe that the "User agents must close all open constructs at the > end of the style sheet." part of §4.1 should apply. > Agreed, but that doesn't mean that such a CSS style sheet fragment is valid. > > Error handling is a big part of what we’re trying to specify with > css3-syntax. The point is to make it interoperable. Oh, I definitely agree we want to do this. I'm a bit more concerned we get the vague semantics of CSS2.1 §4.2 Malformed Declarations/Statements corrected, especially w.r.t. while observing the rules for matching pairs of (), [], {}, "", and '', and > correctly handling escapes G.
Received on Wednesday, 30 January 2013 03:32:16 UTC