- From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 20:31:23 -0700
- To: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CACQ=j+cRYEWdiUxi1vOS9oYCFMgKJmn_rssxkcKV0MZ2FStCXQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr> wrote:
> Le 30/01/2013 00:30, Glenn Adams a écrit :
>
>>
>> * EOF in selector mode should be a parse error (a {} block is missing)
>> * EOF in at-rule prelude should be like ';'. A parse error for
>> declarations-filled or rule-filled at-rules, but not for other
>> at-rules:
>>
>> data:text/html,<style>@import "data:text/css,body{__**
>> background:green"
>>
>>
>> In the example above the @import rule is valid even though it ends
>> with EOF rather than ';'
>>
>>
>> I would not agree this is valid. Rather, its operation depends on
>> interoperable error handling behavior.
>>
>
> Indeed, the above @import rule is invalid per the CSS 2.1 core grammar,
> but I believe that the "User agents must close all open constructs at the
> end of the style sheet." part of §4.1 should apply.
>
Agreed, but that doesn't mean that such a CSS style sheet fragment is valid.
>
> Error handling is a big part of what we’re trying to specify with
> css3-syntax. The point is to make it interoperable.
Oh, I definitely agree we want to do this. I'm a bit more concerned we get
the vague semantics of CSS2.1 §4.2 Malformed Declarations/Statements
corrected, especially w.r.t.
while observing the rules for matching pairs of (), [], {}, "", and '', and
> correctly handling escapes
G.
Received on Wednesday, 30 January 2013 03:32:16 UTC