- From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:37:36 +0100
- To: John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>
- CC: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Le 28/01/2013 12:18, John Daggett a écrit : > Simon Sapin wrote: > >> In §4.2 Font family: the font-family descriptor: >> >>> This descriptor defines the font family name that will be used in >>> all CSS font family name matching, overriding font family names >>> contained in the underlying font data. >> >> This seems to imply that the family names in the downloaded data are >> used if the font-family descriptor is not provided. But this is not >> the case according to §4.1: >> >>> @font-face rules require a font-family and src descriptor, if >>> either of these are missing the @font-face must be ignored. > Simon, I don't see how rules covering the lack of*descriptors* in any > way contradicts the fact that font family names contained within font > data are ignored. The value of the 'font-family' and 'src' > descriptors is in no way related to the font family name given within > font data. Conflating "family names in the downloaded data" with > "value of the font-family descriptor" seems like a simple > misreading of the spec as written. Ok, it’s minor, and it might just be me mis-reading "overriding". -- Simon Sapin
Received on Monday, 28 January 2013 11:38:05 UTC