- From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr>
- Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 10:33:57 +0100
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- CC: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Le 27/01/2013 02:55, Bjoern Hoehrmann a écrit : > As a matter of good governance, the CSS Working Group should stick > with the syntax that it promises will never ever change, as much as is > possible at least, and even if there was no such promise, it shouldn't > make changes to the syntax for no reason (you have not shown that there > is a valid reason); I agree on the principle, but why keep a promise when three of four major implementations do something else, and probably always have? U+0080 is already non-ASCII in WebKit, Presto, and Trident: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2013Jan/att-0039/U_0080_as_non-ASCII.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2013Jan/att-0039/U_007F_as_non-ASCII.html > one reason is that a change as proposed might lead > to arguments with I18N Core about the merits of C1 control characters as > initial character in identifiers, which does not seem to be a good use > of either Working Group's time. As I said in a previous email, let’s not go there. I’m certainly not trying to have that discussion. -- Simon Sapin
Received on Sunday, 27 January 2013 09:34:20 UTC