- From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 22:59:00 +0100
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- CC: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Le 24/01/2013 22:13, Bjoern Hoehrmann a écrit : > Your worry about existing content misses the option to change the defi- > nition of "non-ASCII character" and also changing how the definition is > used in other parts of the document. Similarily, the document could use > a different term than "non-ASCII character" to avoid some of the issues > you mentioned. If I understand correctly, you’re suggesting editorial-only changes. Either: * Change "non-ASCII" to U+0080+, add a "C1 control character" definition, and replace occurrences of "non-ASCII" by "non-ASCII except C1 control characters". Or something similar. * Use another term instead of "non-ASCII". This would address the current definition being "wrong" but not what I really want. Which is being able to implement a conforming tokenizer that, for efficiency, pretends that UTF-8 bytes are code points. My proposal is to change "non-ASCII" to U+0080+, and nothing else. -- Simon Sapin
Received on Thursday, 24 January 2013 21:59:23 UTC