- From: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 21:16:29 -0800
- To: Philippe Wittenbergh <ph.wittenbergh@l-c-n.com>
- Cc: W3C www-style mailing list <www-style@w3.org>, www-style@gtalbot.org, Mohammed Kashim <me@mgakashim.com>
- Message-ID: <CAGN7qDAW5By9NLrsuX3gGBf6ZbbP6r9pi=cOvKCsDxATMTbzEg@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh < ph.wittenbergh@l-c-n.com> wrote: > > Le 19 janv. 2013 à 12:41, "Gérard Talbot" <www-style@gtalbot.org> a écrit > : > > > Name: opacity > > (...) > > Inherited: no > > (...) > > If the object is a container element, then the effect is as if the > > contents of the container element were blended against the current > > background using a mask where the value of each pixel of the mask is > > <alphavalue>. > > " > > 3.2. Transparency: the 'opacity' property > > http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-color/#transparency > > > > When applying opacity to a container div, then it should not apply and > > does not apply to its children. > > The opacity property applies to the element and all what it contains. The > whole box and its descendants will be 'faded' or translucent [*]. Of > course, the descendent elements will no have any opacity applied (unless > some opacity is specified for them). > > As pointed out by Rik Cabanier, what the OP is (possibly) looking for is > applying some transparency to the background (and eventually borders) of > the element — in which case rgba() or hsla() colours should be used. > Yes, there is no way to control opacity of the border + background today. Looking at the drawing order, backgrounds and borders are always drawn in tandem. [1] So, it should be possible to create keywords to control the opacity of: - the border - the background - the border and the background 1: http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/zindex.html > > [*] the wording in the spec is very confusing for stylesheet authors, > I've seen that same request often posted to mailing lists (CSS-D and the > like). > > Philippe > -- > Philippe Wittenbergh > http://l-c-n.com > > > > > >
Received on Saturday, 19 January 2013 05:16:56 UTC