- From: John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 01:25:41 -0800 (PST)
- To: "CSS WWW Style (www-style@w3.org)" <www-style@w3.org>
- Cc: WWW International <www-international@w3.org>
Tab Atkins wrote: > > Huh? Counters are matched case sensitively across all user agents > > now. ASCII case insensitivity is used for situations where an ASCII > > keyword is matched, which is a different case altogether from a > > user-defined string. An author can use whatever casing they like for > > their own identifiers, what huge utility is there to caseless matching > > of these identifiers that warrants introducing a *third* type of case > > matching to web platform?!? > > This was established very early on, at the last f2f: using CS matching > for user idents makes it confusing when you mix language-defined and > user-defined idents in the same namespace, such as custom property > names and counter-style names. I don't see any discussion about this specific point in the minutes of the last F2F [1], nor the one before that [2]. Maybe there was a telcon during June/July you're thinking about? You and fantasai put together a wiki page where you note this point: http://wiki.csswg.org/topics/custom-ident-case-sensitivity >From that page: So, we resolved to make user-defined identifiers (like counter-names and namespace prefixes) case-sensitive to avoid dealing with Unicode case-folding and other complications. This is fine for things that are entirely user-defined, like counters and namespace prefixes, but Tab noticed that it presents a problem when we get to counter-styles: all our styles right now are predefined keywords, and are thus case-insensitive ASCII. When we use @counter-style to define counter styles, we will be allowing users to create their own counter styles. Will those be case-sensitive? What if the user redefines an existing counter-style? I think you can have case sensitive user identifiers and still match existing keywords case insensitively. I don't see that as being that confusing to authors. The flip side is if you make counters match case insensitively, why don't class names match case insensitively? They are both completely user defined. That seems more incongruent for those just learning CSS. Other than keyword matching, CSS is already mostly case sensitive, as is HTML5. In the case of user defined identifiers, users can pick any casing style they desire, I don't see a strong use case for introducing a third type of case sensitivity to the web platform as a whole, which is effectively what you're proposing. Regards, John [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Nov/0263.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Aug/0899.html
Received on Wednesday, 16 January 2013 09:26:09 UTC