- From: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 17:27:28 -0800
- To: srirama chandra sekhar mogali <srirama179@gmail.com>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, Praveen Munukutla <mvssspraveen@gmail.com>, "sagar.sahu127@gmail.com" <sagar.sahu127@gmail.com>
On 1/7/13 5:12 AM, "srirama chandra sekhar mogali" <srirama179@gmail.com> wrote: > >Hi Alan, > >Thanks for the clarification. Regarding the 2nd question below, you have >mentioned that the content should always wrap around the shape only >regardless of it size. What about the shape-inside case, should the >content overflow the bounding box and fit to the > shape if the shape is bigger than the bounding box or should it be >wrapped inside the bounding box itself? >As i see the current implementation in webkit considers bounding box >instead of shape if the shape is bigger than bounding box. > >Regards, >Sriram That's a timely question. Rossen and I discussed this along with a few other issues last month, and we have an upcoming edit that will say that we use the intersection of the shape and the content area in the shape-inside case. Making the shape inside larger will not allow content to 'escape' the content area. This limits the feature but preserves sanity, I think. Thanks, Alan
Received on Thursday, 10 January 2013 01:27:59 UTC