- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 11:00:44 -0800
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 10:12 PM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: > I think http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-animations/ doesn't say what > happens for this testcase: > > @keyframes bounce { from { margin-left: 0px } to { margin-left: 100px } } > p { animation: bounce 1s linear, bounce 3s linear } > > In particular, it doesn't say which of these two animations > overrides the other. This is due to a quirk in wording here: > > # If at one point in time there are multiple animations > # specifying behavior for the same property, the animation whose > # name occurs last in the value of ‘animation-name’ will override > # the other animations at that point. > -- http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-animations/#animations > > Since "the animation whose name occurs last in the value of > 'animation-name'" doesn't disambiguate the two, since they have the > same name. > > I think dropping the "whose name" would probably make it correct, > but it might be worth making things a little clearer than that. Good catch. I think just doing s/whose name/which/ would be sufficient. I think the only reason you caught the difference is because you're explicitly rules-lawyering; my interpretation of that sentence was always what we're assuming it intends to say. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 8 January 2013 19:01:31 UTC