- From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 19:31:02 -0500
- To: Nick Gravgaard <me@nickgravgaard.com>
- Cc: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, www-style@w3.org
On Fri, 2013-01-04 at 16:33 +0000, Nick Gravgaard wrote: > Can anyone (apart from Simon who may be a little biased ;) tell me if I > should work on WeasyPrint or a more widely used implementation such as > Gecko or WebKit? For the purpose of advancing specs at W3C... We (W3C) are looking to see that the spec can be implemented - e.g. that there isn't a feature A that, if implemented, makes it impossible or difficult to implement feature B, or that there isn't a feature that isn't described well enough to implement. On the other hand it'd be nice to see the feature in at least one Web browser, since in practice that's the primary CSS platform. Liam -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/ Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml The barefoot typographer
Received on Saturday, 5 January 2013 00:31:06 UTC