- From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr>
- Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 01:20:07 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org
Le 24/02/2013 01:16, Tab Atkins Jr. a écrit : > As I said above, implementors purposely didn't want multiple cascaded > values, so this is the intended effect for level 1. It is likely that > authors will end up depending on this property, at least accidentally, > and so we wont' be able to change it in the future. That is sad. Is there an alternative for having similar fallbacks? @supports probably works, but it a bit heavy-weight. -- Simon Sapin
Received on Sunday, 24 February 2013 00:20:30 UTC