Re: [css3-page] comments on last ED

Also sprach Daniel Glazman:

 > The CSS WG is not responsible if vendors implement unstabilized features
 > and if users of these vendors use the features. It says nothing about
 > the quality of the solution they're using. It only says they use it.
 > Good for YesLogic and AntennaHouse who shipped experimental features
 > to the masses, bad for the W3C Process, something you should care about,
 > right?

This functionality went to CR more than 9 years ago:

   http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/CR-css3-page-20040225/

According to the Process document, "Candiated Recommendation" is,
specifically, a "Call for Implementations".

   http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#cfi

So, why do you think implementing CSS3-PAGE is bad for process?

-h&kon
              Håkon Wium Lie                          CTO °þe®ª
howcome@opera.com                  http://people.opera.com/howcome

Received on Friday, 22 February 2013 07:32:40 UTC