- From: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 09:15:48 +0100
- To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Cc: "www-style\@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Also sprach Daniel Glazman:
> Not sure the page and page counters' definition in section 7.1
> should not belong to the GCPM spec.
Double negatives makes parsing harder. But I do not think we should
move page counters to GCPM, if that's what you are proposing. It seems
we have intereoperability in three shipping implementations:
http://people.opera.com/howcome/2013/tests/css3-page/page-counters.html
http://people.opera.com/howcome/2013/tests/css3-page/page-counters-antennahouse.pdf
http://people.opera.com/howcome/2013/tests/css3-page/page-counters-prince.pdf
http://people.opera.com/howcome/2013/tests/css3-page/page-counters-weasyprint.pdf
-h&kon
Håkon Wium Lie CTO °þe®ª
howcome@opera.com http://people.opera.com/howcome
Received on Thursday, 21 February 2013 08:16:27 UTC