On Wednesday 2013-02-20 20:29 -0800, Andrew Fedoniouk wrote: > And so if I have these two rules: > > a:link { color:red; } > a:link:hover { color:blue; transition: color 2s ease; } > > then it will be no :hover -> :not(:hover) transition at all, correct? Correct. > But if {initial} -> :hover transition will be canceled before its end > (so :hover -> :not(:hover) switch in 2 seconds) then we will actually > see backward transition. Is this correct/desirable? In my opinion, no, which is why I object to the current rules of reversing of transitions. -David -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozilla http://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂Received on Thursday, 21 February 2013 05:16:17 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:26 UTC