Re: [css3-page] comments on last ED

On 02/20/2013 05:55 AM, Daniel Glazman wrote:
>
> The CSS WG is not responsible if vendors implement unstabilized features
> and if users of these vendors use the features. It says nothing about
> the quality of the solution they're using. It only says they use it.
> Good for YesLogic and AntennaHouse who shipped experimental features
> to the masses, bad for the W3C Process, something you should care about,
> right?

CSS3 Page went to CR already. We pulled it back because so much of it
was poorly-defined, and the definitions thus need several rounds of
edits before we get them right. But the features themselves have not
changed much in design from the CR.

~fantasai

Received on Thursday, 21 February 2013 00:46:45 UTC