- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:46:17 -0800
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 02/20/2013 05:55 AM, Daniel Glazman wrote: > > The CSS WG is not responsible if vendors implement unstabilized features > and if users of these vendors use the features. It says nothing about > the quality of the solution they're using. It only says they use it. > Good for YesLogic and AntennaHouse who shipped experimental features > to the masses, bad for the W3C Process, something you should care about, > right? CSS3 Page went to CR already. We pulled it back because so much of it was poorly-defined, and the definitions thus need several rounds of edits before we get them right. But the features themselves have not changed much in design from the CR. ~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 21 February 2013 00:46:45 UTC