W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2013

Re: AnimationEvents for pseudo-elements

From: Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:27:57 -0800
Message-ID: <CADh5Ky0rAXbCzuFxALYb2a=D3mGaQx_4M3N8ANeM2DchYMt+nQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
Cc: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, Elliott Sprehn <esprehn@gmail.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 9:39 AM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote:
> On Friday 2013-02-01 16:27 -0500, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
>> On 2/1/13 4:23 PM, Elliott Sprehn wrote:
>> >Separately I've received personal email from developers expressing that
>> >they want this to just fire the regular events.
>> Sure.  If I were designing/shipping this from scratch, firing the
>> regular events would make total sense.
>> What worries me is that it'll be a source of compat problems for
>> those of us who have actually supported transitions/animations on
>> pseudo-elements for a while.  And I'm frankly tired of being the
>> compat guinea pig for this sort of stuff on web pages that
>> browser-sniff all over the place...
> I think we should just be the compat guinea-pig on this; I tend to
> think it's unreasonable to have multiple event names.

I agree with David, but it's easy for me. I understand the guinea-pig thing.

Received on Wednesday, 20 February 2013 18:28:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:26 UTC