- From: Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:27:57 -0800
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Cc: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, Elliott Sprehn <esprehn@gmail.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 9:39 AM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: > On Friday 2013-02-01 16:27 -0500, Boris Zbarsky wrote: >> On 2/1/13 4:23 PM, Elliott Sprehn wrote: >> >Separately I've received personal email from developers expressing that >> >they want this to just fire the regular events. >> >> Sure. If I were designing/shipping this from scratch, firing the >> regular events would make total sense. >> >> What worries me is that it'll be a source of compat problems for >> those of us who have actually supported transitions/animations on >> pseudo-elements for a while. And I'm frankly tired of being the >> compat guinea pig for this sort of stuff on web pages that >> browser-sniff all over the place... > > I think we should just be the compat guinea-pig on this; I tend to > think it's unreasonable to have multiple event names. I agree with David, but it's easy for me. I understand the guinea-pig thing. :DG<
Received on Wednesday, 20 February 2013 18:28:25 UTC