- From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 07:30:12 -0700
- To: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 20 February 2013 14:31:00 UTC
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr> wrote: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/**Public/www-style/2013Feb/0278.**html<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0278.html> > > 1. Perhaps for team-legal rather than this WG? When a spec contains > detailed algorithm in English, implementing it may look like "translating" > it to a computer language, similar to translating the spec to another human > language. > > Clarify that implementing is not a "derivative work" forbidden by the W3C > Document License? > I think we should take no action on this (in the text) except to defer to the W3C Team for advice. That is, we should not add text regarding "derivative work" unless instructed to do so by the team. This is not a issue specific to CSS3 Syntax.
Received on Wednesday, 20 February 2013 14:31:00 UTC