Liam R E Quin skriver: > On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 16:16 +0000, Jake Archibald wrote: >> The proposed system would allow for, eg, format('webp-progressive'), >> format('jpeg-smellovision'). > > How about, format('image/jpeg', 'smellovision') ? > That still leaves some problems: who decides which subfeatures should be queryable? Who will manage the list of them? Can we even assume that implementors even have the ability to know which subfeatures they themself support?Received on Wednesday, 20 February 2013 14:02:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:26 UTC