- From: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:37:50 +1100
- To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Cc: "robert@ocallahan.org" <robert@ocallahan.org>, Jake Archibald <jaffathecake@gmail.com>, "liam@w3.org" <liam@w3.org>, W3C CSS Mailing List <www-style@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAGN7qDCWZypmW42uEw0tzW2ZUyfcVX=eERxt7BqOfHEgLhmYrg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 7:20 AM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Feb 19, 2013, at 10:34 AM, Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>wrote: > >> On Feb 18, 2013, at 12:50 PM, "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org> >> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 3:11 AM, Jake Archibald <jaffathecake@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> mpo (3d format support by DS browser) >>> >> bmp >>> >> tiff >>> eps >>> >>> >> Is there any significant use of these formats on the Web, or any reason >> to start using them? If not, we shouldn't encourage people to use them by >> supporting them here. >> >> >> The OP request was not to support the formats, it was to identify the >> formats so that loading of unsupported formats could be skipped without an >> http request. So, while I don't expect significant use on the Web, I would >> expect some support for tiff and eps in some non-Web implementations, such >> as Prince or WeasyPrint, perhaps. Maybe even some ePub implementations? >> EPS is very common in professional print production, even for raster images >> (especially for CMYK). So is TIFF. >> > > Is that still the case? > I thought PDF pretty much replaced those classic formats. The Adobe > publishing apps have to jump through a bunch of hoops to support EPS > properly. PDF is much easier and more reliable. > > > It is where I work, although I think the EPS files might also contain code > to allow opening as a PDF or something. > hmm, you have to be very careful in your workflow or that code is destroyed. In general, I believe that we discourage people from creating device dependent EPS. > But we export EPS from photoshop in CMYK frequently, and it includes a > preview image for faster rendering in InDesign. > Why not link directly to PSD? > > We mainly use TIFF for one bit images, as they are easy to colorize (even > in spot colors) in programs like InDesign. > > This is mostly done by other people where I work now, so I may be a little > rusty on the details. > I think EPS is old-school so shouldn't be included. (PDF is much better) The fact that it is executable code (Postscript is a programming language after all) should be enough to not include it as a supported format.
Received on Wednesday, 20 February 2013 04:38:18 UTC