- From: Nicholas Shanks <nickshanks@nickshanks.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 11:37:13 +0000
- To: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+hEJVWzm69VzfM-ehGi1ppqfBx0zxVbej54zoaFbJkpZaey2A@mail.gmail.com>
I would rather see: jpeg-xr png-anim than "jxr" and "apng". also, since mpo, jpeg-2000 and jpeg-xr are all supported by only one client each, there's I think they can be left out of a 'critical' set, if that's what you are trying to define, but the two 2D formats should be defined if you are intending to be a bit broader with initial defined format names. On Friday, 15 February 2013, Jake Archibald wrote: > On 14 February 2013 17:32, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com<javascript:;>> > wrote: > > Do you have any idea what set of format strings we should initially > support? > > gif > jpeg > png > webp > svg > mpo (3d format support by DS browser) > jxr (jpeg xr, supported in IE) > > The above seems like the minimum set. I don't think we need any > subsets of those, although SVG could be a likely candidate if you > wanted to be explicit about SMIL. With something as complex as SVG, > it's probably better do check for basic support then do the rest of > the feature detection in the SVG file itself. > > I don't think we need to include formats that aren't optimised for the > web, such as bmp, tiff, tga, eps etc. I didn't include jpeg2000 as no > one seems interested in supporting it. > > -- Nicholas.
Received on Friday, 15 February 2013 11:37:44 UTC