- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 08:40:39 -0800
- To: Behrang Saeedzadeh <behrangsa@gmail.com>
- Cc: Sebastian Zartner <sebastianzartner@gmail.com>, W3C CSS Mailing List <www-style@w3.org>
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 6:55 PM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: > > On Tuesday 2013-02-12 08:01 +0100, Sebastian Zartner wrote: > > > So I really wonder why adjusting all four sides - at least blur and > > > spread radii - is met with that much refusal. It would allow to create > > > more natural drop shadows and give the author more creative freedom > > > for designing shadows. > > > > Given that the sorts of effects you're talking about can be created > > with images, I think if you want to make a case that is at all > > credible, you need to point to substantial numbers of existing pages > > on the Web that are using images to create the sort of effect that > > you'd like to be possible using this new CSS feature, and > > demonstrate that what they're doing can be achieved with the same > > level of quality (e.g., without the corners coming out wrong) with > > the proposed new CSS feature. On Thursday 2013-02-14 01:26 +1100, Behrang Saeedzadeh wrote: > How many web pages do I/we need to find to convince the decision makers > that this sort of effect is indeed popular? There aren't clear criteria; it depends on how prominent the Web pages are (which is perhaps a sign of how far you had to look to find them), how well-designed they are, and probably other factors. -David -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozilla http://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂
Received on Wednesday, 13 February 2013 16:41:04 UTC