- From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr>
- Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 17:20:00 -0800
- To: Werner Donné <werner.donne@pincette.biz>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Le 23/04/2012 08:41, Werner Donné a écrit :
> I have one more remark about the production you propose. It is, of
> course, correct, but it isn't LL, because there is a choice conflict
> between the two groups. It is also not easy to transform into an
> LL(k) production, because the required number of look-ahead tokens is
> infinite. I don't know if LL is a requirement, but it would rule out
> a top-down parser if it isn't. Flute, for example, is implemented
> with JavaCC, which expects an LL(k) grammar.
Fixed. The grammar in the ED is now as follows:
page :
PAGE_SYM S* [ page_selector S* [ ',' page_selector S* ]* ]?
'{' S* page_body '}' S*
;
page_body : /* Can be empty */
declaration? [ ';' S* page_body ]? |
page_margin_box page_body
;
Thanks to Tab Atkins and David Baron for their grammar-fu.
Alternatively, css3-syntax defines this in terms of a state machine. I’d
like to change css3-page to refer to that, eventually.
http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-syntax/
Cheers,
--
Simon Sapin
Received on Tuesday, 12 February 2013 01:20:32 UTC