- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 23:51:37 -0800
- To: www-style@w3.org
I've done a bit of rearraging of the "Animatable:" lines, as we discussed at the Tucson face-to-face meeting. First, I've made the property descriptions in the table in http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-transitions/#animatable-css be in the same format that I expect "Animatable:" lines in new modules to be in; Animatable lines either say "no" or say "as <type>" with the name of and a link to some type that describes the animation rules. Most of these types are defined in the transitions spec, but some specs will define other types (e.g., css3-transforms for 'transform', css3-fonts for 'font-stretch'). Second, I've moved everything that was not a property in either CSS 2.1 or css3-color out of that list and into other modules. This means I've added "Animatable" lines to all the modules that had properties previously mentioned in that table (including in the issue at the bottom) except for the 'crop' property, which we don't appear have a specification for. There are still many other modules that need "Animatable:" lines, though. The edits to specifications other than css3-transitions are: css3-ui: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/rev/0df32ea51959 css-text-decor-3: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/rev/45007c88f5c7 css3-multicol: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/rev/34298d3d5627 css3-fonts: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/rev/55bbedf65a90 css3-transforms: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/rev/55d46b236cf3 -David -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozilla http://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂
Received on Friday, 8 February 2013 07:52:00 UTC