- From: Chris Eppstein <chris@eppsteins.net>
- Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 11:43:07 -0800
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CANyEp6WYBHAxmkMNjwvSbHx4gSPYfqzHuJYvXq2_36q_MzwrOA@mail.gmail.com>
This is the behavior that Sass has when a variable is assigned an explicit value of `null`. -chris On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>wrote: > While making the recent commits, I made the grammar of custom properties > be: > > [ <value> | <CDO> | <CDC> ]* > > This means that the value of a custom property can be nothing. > > This is useful from an authoring perspective - without it, variables > can't ever be used to control something which has a special effect > when omitted, like the "inset" keyword in box-shadow. > > It violates the CSS 2.1 Section 4 grammar, though, which requires > property values to contain at least one non-comment or whitespace > token. However, it's not technically problematic - the Syntax spec > accidentally handled it already. > > I believe Glenn brought up a related issue, which is that it would be > difficult to tell in the OM between a property set to nothing and one > not set at all. This can be avoided by using the new "var" property > on CSSStyleDeclaration, as only valid variables show up there. (You > can use " 'foo' in style.var " to test it.) This is the intended > method to interact with variables anyway, as it's more convenient, so > we can probably ignore this issue. > > ~TJ > >
Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2013 19:43:35 UTC