- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 20:25:26 -0700
- To: François REMY <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com>
- Cc: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Tuesday 2013-02-05 21:55 +0100, François REMY wrote: > I would prefer the grammar of a property value to accept any token > inside a block except block terminators <},],)> and not just a > limited subset of tokens. But if there's a good reason to limit > the subset, that's fine. It looks to me like the only things forbidden inside of a block inside of a value by http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/syndata.html#tokenization are: 1. unmatched }, ], and ) 2. {, [, and ( without a matching pair later 3. BAD_STRING, BAD_URI, and BAD_COMMENT Is the intent of your comment to suggest that (2) and (3), that is, opening constructs that don't have a matching closing construct, should be allowed within value? Or are there other differences that I'm missing? -David -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozilla http://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂
Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2013 03:25:54 UTC