- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 20:10:49 -0700
- To: François REMY <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Tuesday 2013-02-05 15:57 +0100, François REMY wrote: > This is much simpler that the current syntax which allows x: {a:a} but not x: {a} or x: {"a":"a"}. I do not think this is correct. To break things down how each of these matches 'value' (I'm presuming you're talknig about "x" being a variable): value(block("{" any(IDENT(a)) any(':') any(IDENT(a)) "}")) value(block("{" any(IDENT(a)) "}")) value(block("{" any(STRING(a)) any(':') any(STRING(a)) "}")) Of course, if you weren't talking about "x" being a variable, but wanted the whole "x: FOO" to be value, that's also straightforward, since the start breaks down as: value(any(IDENT("x"))any(":"S*(" "))) and then the rest can still continue matching the entire [...]+ in the value production. -David -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozilla http://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂
Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2013 03:11:13 UTC