- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 10:02:26 -0800
- To: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr> wrote: > Hi, > > From css3-fonts: > >> Ranges specified with ‘?’ that lack an initial digit (e.g. "U+???") >> are also valid, and are treated as if there was a single 0 before the >> question marks (thus, "U+???" = "U+0???" = "U+0000-0FFF"). "U+??????" >> is not a syntax error, even though "U+0??????" would be. > > > As pointed out by John Daggett, U+??? is currently not tokenized as an > unicode-range by css3-syntax, but should be. > > Related issue: https://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Tracker/issues/70 > > Proposed change, in §4.4.1. Data state: > >> U+0055 LATIN CAPITAL LETTER U (U) >> U+0075 LATIN SMALL LETTER U (u) >> If the next 2 input character are U+002B PLUS SIGN (+) followed by a >> hex digit, […] > > > Replace "followed by a hex digit" with "followed by a hex digit or a U+003F > QUESTION MARK (?) character". Done, thanks. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 5 February 2013 18:03:16 UTC