- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 10:11:58 -0700
- To: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
- Cc: Dean Jackson <dino@apple.com>, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>, Kevin Babbitt <kbabbitt@microsoft.com>
On Monday 2013-02-04 10:06 -0700, Simon Fraser wrote: > On Feb 4, 2013, at 9:47 AM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: > > > So I think we should require matched lengths for the properties > > whose lengths matter: in other words, we should still require > > matched lengths for background-image. I have no idea what it would > > mean to do otherwise. > > One option would be to cross-fade() from some kind of transparent image. I wouldn't want to do that without defining cross-fade() between images... I think that's something for css4-images. > For shadow transitions (box-shadow, text-shadow), WebKit does > allow transitions between lists of different lengths, synthesizing > the missing shadows (using shadows with zero radius and spread, > matching "inset" with the corresponding shadow, and choosing a sensible > color (possibly "transparent"). This is already specified in the spec; "shadow" is its own transition type that's not "list" or "repeatable list". -David -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozilla http://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂
Received on Monday, 4 February 2013 17:12:45 UTC