- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 16:08:59 -0500
- To: Alexis Menard <alexis.menard@intel.com>
- CC: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On 2/1/13 3:28 PM, Alexis Menard wrote: >> In case it wasn't clear, my proposal is that we have transitionend for >> normal transitions and something like beforetransitionend for transitions on >> ::before, say. > > But what if in the future we animate more pseudo elements or add > animatable pseudo elements? Perhaps the right solution is to have a "pseudotransitionend" that will fire for any pseudo-element and include the pseudo-element type in the event? This would all be a bit less of a compat worry if these events didn't bubble, but they do... which means that random transitions/animations on psuedo-elements way down the tree will trigger listeners on all ancestors. :( -Boris
Received on Friday, 1 February 2013 21:09:28 UTC