- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 13:29:03 -0500
- To: Alexis Menard <alexis@webkit.org>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
On 2/1/13 1:21 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > Yes, so? People are in fact doing those already, last I checked, > because as I said they've been working in Gecko for years. And to be more precise: 1) Gecko has supported transitions on pseudo-elements since Firefox 4 (March 2011) and animations on pseudo-elements since Firefox 5 (June 2011). 2) I have seen pages that do a -webkit-transition on an element but do the corresponding unprefixed transition and -moz-transition on the pseudo-element on the assumption that unprefixed implementations support the pseudo-element bit and given the data point that Gecko does support it. These pages are not expecting an event on the pseudo-element and would be likely to behave incorrectly if they do get an event for that transition. I believe we should use a different event name for the pseudo-element transitions so that web pages don't get unexpected events suddenly popping up. -Boris
Received on Friday, 1 February 2013 18:29:32 UTC