On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>wrote: > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 2:02 AM, François REMY > <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com> wrote: > >> From: mike.sherov@gmail.com > >> I like that approach too. Either works. Why didn't it move forward, > >> and what would prevent it moving forward now? > > > > As far as I know, nothing technical. It just didn't make the cut in the > UA's priorities. Who knows, now that Tab Atkins is full steam on CSS > Polyfilling, I guess there's some possibility to change that ;-) > > Also, the relevant spec where it would have appeared (CSSOM) lost its > editors for quite a while. > we're not lost, just incredibly busy... as for whether it could appear in CSSOM at the first go, i rather have my doubts unless there is significant and widespread interoperable implementation; on the other hand, i realize there is a chicken and egg problem here... i'd suggest you (mike) obtain a commitment to implement in a number of UAs, get agreement on the details from that group, then make a formal proposal here
Received on Friday, 1 February 2013 06:39:32 UTC