On 1/31/13 9:11 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > In that case, let's get this done. Francois' outline of a solution > earlier in this thread sounds great to me. The only thing I'd change > is to make the property name optional too, in which case it's > identical to calling getComputedStyle() on the element. So it returns a string if you pass in the property name but a random live object if you don't? I don't see why we'd want to do that, honestly. Also, in terms of argument order, I would think that the type of style would be specified more often than a pseudo-element, but maybe I'm wrong... Past that, the proposal seems ok to me, I think. -BorisReceived on Friday, 1 February 2013 02:22:15 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:24 UTC