- From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 16:13:43 +0200
- To: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
Le 25/04/2013 20:19, Håkon Wium Lie a écrit : > Simon Sapin wrote: > > > > §9.6.1 of CSS 2.1 says: > > >> For paged media, boxes with fixed positions are repeated on every page. > > > > > > Is this really *every* page, including content-empty pages generated by > > > forced page breaks? If so, does the :blank page selector still match? > > I can go either way on this one. The strictest interpretation would be > to, indeed, show fixed boxes on every page and not have :blank match > blank pages resulting from forced page breaks. > > Another reasonable clarification would be to say the fixed are shown > on all pages, except those that are left empty by forced page breaks. > > In printed publications I don't find fixed very useful as there is no > no way to control which pages it would appear on. > > > Bonus question: does content in page-margin boxes makes a page not > > "content-empty"? This affects the :blank selector. > > > > I think it should not. Otherwise, the result of whether :blank matches a > > given page would depend on itself: > > > > @page :blank { @top-center { content: "Not blank." } > > Right, so we are saying that content in the margin boxes does not > effect whether :blank matches or not? I agree with that. Although there was no strong opinion either way, the WG resolved this week that: * Boxes with `position: fixed` are repeated on every page, even additional pages generated by forced page breaks. * :blank matches additional pages generated by forced page breaks, even if they have content in `position: fixed` boxes or page-margin boxes. The definition of "content empty page" needs to be changed to reflect that. Or maybe the concept can be removed entirely. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Apr/0576.html -- Simon Sapin
Received on Friday, 26 April 2013 14:14:08 UTC