- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 10:59:06 -0400
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 4/25/13 8:51 AM, Simon Pieters wrote: > Fixed (modulo https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21827 ). > > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/rev/b4e2a9a9114c Welcome to the hell that is using IDL arrays. You at least need to define in prose which of the three totally different kinds of IDL arrays you're returning, because they all look identical in the IDL. Once that's done it'll be possible to evaluate whether we have the behavior we want... :( > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/rev/378779e5e3bb That's really really bad. Incredibly bad. Other specs don't have this problem; why does this one? :( Can we put this note in the IDL itself somehow? > Does anyone have an opinion about changing the other list types? > StyleSheetList, CSSRuleList, MediaList? Are we 100% sure that no one is using .item() on any of those? -Boris
Received on Thursday, 25 April 2013 14:59:38 UTC