- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 15:36:59 +0200
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 17/04/13 23:10, François REMY wrote: >> One drawback to using a functional pseudo-element compared to an @rule is >> more typing. If you have more than one selector argument to pass to the >> function you have to repeat .container::distributed() for each selector. > > The lack of nested rules shouldn't be a reason to introduce more at-rules. Shouldn't selectors and @rules be kept orthogonal? I just don't understand such arguments. It's like saying we should get rid of :first-child because we have :nth-child(1). Both constructs have pros and cons and I don't see any orthogonality here. </Daniel>
Received on Thursday, 25 April 2013 13:37:28 UTC