- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 20:46:40 -0700
- To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Cc: Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, Julien Chaffraix <jchaffraix@google.com>, Elliott Sprehn <esprehn@google.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 19, 2013, at 6:03 PM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: >> We had discussions two f2fs ago about relying solely on named areas to >> provide names. It's not usable. (I tried.) > > It seems to have changed a lot since then, though, and I'm not sure the current melange of named grid areas and named grid lines is better. As I dig into the current version more, I'm finding it pretty confusing. It hasn't changed in any way relevant to the discussion; we've just rearranged some syntax. The underlying issue is still there - lines are tied to a more generic concept of "regions", which can overlap and nest, unlike grid areas. They can also repeat, which isn't compatible with grid areas. ~TJ
Received on Sunday, 21 April 2013 03:47:27 UTC