- From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
- Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 10:27:04 +1200
- To: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Cc: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 19 April 2013 22:27:32 UTC
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 7:45 AM, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote: > An alternative could be to expose subpixel values for scrollWidth and > clientWidth (et al). IE supports this but requires opt-in: > http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2012/02/17/sub-pixel-rendering-and-the-css-object-model.aspx > > Would it be Web-compatible to expose subpixel values in CSSOM View? > Hard to say. Microsoft obviously isn't sure :-). (I don't object to adding scrollMaxX/Y. Maybe we should do both?) > I would like to do both. Apart from being safe, scrollMaxX/Y is also more convenient and intuitive for authors. Rob -- q“qIqfq qyqoquq qlqoqvqeq qtqhqoqsqeq qwqhqoq qlqoqvqeq qyqoquq,q qwqhqaqtq qcqrqeqdqiqtq qiqsq qtqhqaqtq qtqoq qyqoquq?q qEqvqeqnq qsqiqnqnqeqrqsq qlqoqvqeq qtqhqoqsqeq qwqhqoq qlqoqvqeq qtqhqeqmq.q qAqnqdq qiqfq qyqoquq qdqoq qgqoqoqdq qtqoq qtqhqoqsqeq qwqhqoq qaqrqeq qgqoqoqdq qtqoq qyqoquq,q qwqhqaqtq qcqrqeqdqiqtq qiqsq qtqhqaqtq qtqoq qyqoquq?q qEqvqeqnq qsqiqnqnqeqrqsq qdqoq qtqhqaqtq.q"
Received on Friday, 19 April 2013 22:27:32 UTC