- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 08:38:20 -0700
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Apr 18, 2013, at 7:21 AM, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: > The CSS WG has published a First Public Working Draft of the CSS > Overflow Module Level 3: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/css-overflow-3/ > > This module describes: > > * the CSS 'overflow' property as in previous levels of CSS, > > * the new 'overflow-x' and 'overflow-y' properties and their > interaction, > > * (to be added here, but currently still in css-gcpm) a new feature > that allows overflow to cause pagination > > * a new feature that allows overflow to cause replication of the > box, dividing the rendering of the element into fragments that > can be styled separately. > > This draft is still relatively early in development, but the group > welcomes feedback on all aspects of the draft. > > Please send any comments to this mailing list, <www-style@w3.org>, and > please, prefix the subject line with > > [css-overflow] > > (as I did on this message). I mentioned it in another thread full of other points, but how do you feel about making 'overflow-x' and 'overflow-y' be based on writing mode, so that 'overflow-x' overflowed to the left for vertical-rl writing? If there are compatibility concerns, this behavior could be switched on with a separate property, such as 'overflow-behavior: logical | physical', or something like that.
Received on Thursday, 18 April 2013 15:38:56 UTC