- From: François REMY <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 09:47:15 +0200
- To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>, "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
And what about /for/ then? > This decision is recorded in previous discussions - using a combinator > violates the implicit assumption that rtl selector evaluation always > ends up with a subset of the elements matched by the first compound > selector. > > ~TJ >
Received on Thursday, 18 April 2013 07:47:42 UTC