W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2013

Re: [selectors4] Open issues

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 15:26:06 -0700
Message-ID: <516F217E.4000106@inkedblade.net>
To: www-style@w3.org
CC: w3c-css-wg <w3c-css-wg@w3.org>
On 04/08/2013 04:22 PM, fantasai wrote:
> There's a good handful of open issues on Selectors 4 that need WG
> discussion to resolve.

Tab and I just finished checking in the changes for these issues,
as resolved in

We would like to request WD publication for next week.

> ISSUE-223: http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Tracker/issues/223
>    Should Selectors adopt MQ-style invalidation (per comma-separated group)?

Closed issue no change.

> ISSUE-316: http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Tracker/issues/316
>    Should ID selectors accept all HASH tokens instead of #ident only?

Added issue to spec until we resolve this:

> ISSUE-317: http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Tracker/issues/317
>    Allow child-index pseudos to select unparented elements

Updated prose and cleaned up indexed-selector section:

> ISSUE-318: https://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Tracker/issues/318
>    Make specificity of :matches() / :not() depend on what was matched

See also rationale wrt specificity of :not()

> ISSUE-319: https://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Tracker/issues/319
>    Need usable selector for empty elements

Added :blank for now:

> ISSUE-320: https://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Tracker/issues/320
>    Profile :matches() / :not() for fast vs. complete implementation

Updated requirements per telecon request:

~fantasai and TJ
Received on Wednesday, 17 April 2013 22:26:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:28 UTC