Agenda conf call 17-apr-2013

Time/Phone/SIP details available to WG Members in w3c-css-wg. See
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2013JanMar/0078.html

** CSS WG Members, please send regrets to Member-only list if you can't
** attend.


0. Scribe, extra agenda items and other digressions
---------------------------------------------------


1. CSS Marquee update
---------------------
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Apr/0224.html


2. Scientific notation on Dimension and Percentage tokens
---------------------------------------------------------
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Apr/0215.html


3. CSS 4 Selectors issues
-------------------------
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Apr/0187.html
ISSUE-316 followup


4. Table cells establishing pseudo-stacking contexts
----------------------------------------------------
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Apr/0145.html


5. CSS 3 UI
-----------
Where are we? Issues? Can we move to LC, how, when?
Test suite?


6. ICC profiles and LAB colors
------------------------------
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Apr/0097.html


7. color-correction into color-interpolation
--------------------------------------------
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Apr/0096.html


8. 'column-fill' and column overflow
------------------------------------
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0042.html


9. flow-into: <ident> content-only
----------------------------------
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Apr/0181.html


10. Recommended justification for Symbols
-----------------------------------------
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Apr/0331.html


11. Text Decoration Issues
--------------------------
http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-text-decor-3/issues-lc-2013#issue-6
  This one could use feedback from the WG, particularly from
  the experts at Adobe. So I'd like to request feedback.

http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-text-decor-3/issues-lc-2013#issue-8
  I think this is a mistake and should be corrected to align with
  CSS2.1; would like to double-check with people about that.


Peter

Received on Tuesday, 16 April 2013 20:55:04 UTC