- From: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 00:55:15 +0200
- To: Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Bert Bos wrote: > There have not been any comments since Fantasai's, as far as I know, and > I agree with hers, so I made a new text that includes her edits. See the > attachment. ... which is here: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Apr/att-0225/tmp.html I have mixed feeelings about the change. On the positive side: - removing lines 03-10 simplifies the pseudo-algorithm - an obstacle for the spec is removed On the negative side: - it's a non-trivial change to a spec in CR - it relies on references to WDs (even if only in a note) - we're removing parts of the spec that has interoperable implementations [1] -- possibly these implemenations may become non-compliant tomorrow, depending on what goes into the WDs - the note says that the definition of U may depend on the computed values of the 'column-count' and 'column-width' properties; I think this complicates shrink-to-fit computatations and may cause circular computations [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0859.html Still, as this only affects a small number of elements (mostly floats with auto-width) spec progress is more important than my mental model. I'll go ahead with the change unless others object. -h&kon Håkon Wium Lie CTO °þe®ª howcome@opera.com http://people.opera.com/howcome
Received on Monday, 15 April 2013 22:55:47 UTC