- From: Pete Boere <pete@the-echoplex.net>
- Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 09:41:03 +0100
- To: "Jens O. Meiert" <jens@meiert.com>
- Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 15 April 2013 08:41:28 UTC
At first this proposal sounded plausable to me, but in this example it's farcical: > style.getPropertyValue('set-foo') And the increased opportunity for confusing** juxtapositions such as: set-purple: green; set-color: red; More or less makes this a non-starter for me. var-* is simpler and more robust in all these cases. On 15 April 2013 01:29, Jens O. Meiert <jens@meiert.com> wrote: > > So, at Rename the Web Forward [1], Sylvain and I concluded that it > > just might be better to use 'set-' as the prefix and 'get()' as the > > function name instead of 'var-' and 'var()'. > > +1, this looks like a very sensible change. > > -- > Jens O. Meiert > http://meiert.com/en/ > > -- Pete Boere Web Developer
Received on Monday, 15 April 2013 08:41:28 UTC