Re: [css-images] conic-gradient and 'at'

On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com> wrote:
> Isn't it needed so you can place the 'middle' of the conic gradient?

Dirk's question and Simon's answer aren't about whether the argument
is needed at all, but rather about the 'at' keyword used to introduce
the argument.

> From the spec, it's unclear how you can rotate the gradient. Why is the
> start angle always as 0 degrees?

Because it's a reasonable choice.  To "rotate" it, just change the
color-stop positions, exactly like you would to get a linear-gradient
to move.

~TJ