On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com> wrote: > Isn't it needed so you can place the 'middle' of the conic gradient? Dirk's question and Simon's answer aren't about whether the argument is needed at all, but rather about the 'at' keyword used to introduce the argument. > From the spec, it's unclear how you can rotate the gradient. Why is the > start angle always as 0 degrees? Because it's a reasonable choice. To "rotate" it, just change the color-stop positions, exactly like you would to get a linear-gradient to move. ~TJReceived on Tuesday, 9 April 2013 21:38:36 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:28 UTC