- From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
- Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 19:46:47 +0200
- To: www-style@w3.org
Le 08/04/2013 19:02, Dirk Schulze a écrit : > On Apr 8, 2013, at 9:34 AM, Tab Atkins Jr.<jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Dirk Schulze<dschulze@adobe.com> wrote: >>> I am not sure if we want to keep conic-gradient at all, but I >>> would suggest to remove the string "at" [1]. I think this just >>> leads to more confusion for web authors. There is no need to >>> require another string which does not have any value for the web >>> author or the UA. >> >> It's there for consistency with radial-gradient(), as it's the same >> argument. > I don't buy this argument actually. In radial-gradient() the 'at' is needed to disambiguate <size> vs. <position>. I *think* that it’s not actually needed for conic-gradient(), but I agree with Tab that the consistency is nice. -- Simon Sapin
Received on Monday, 8 April 2013 17:47:12 UTC