On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 3:02 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote: >> I think we should remove the EventTarget dependency for now and >> address this use case at a later point when futures gain a way to get >> insight into the progress of the operation they represent the result >> for. > > This doesn't make sense. We do want ProgressFuture for Font.ready() > (so you can indicate when a font *starts* loading, which is currently > hidden), but the events I've left are on FontList, and can't be > replaced by a ProgressFuture. How does ready() not provide the same functionality provided it will gain progress notifications going forward? -- http://annevankesteren.nl/Received on Monday, 8 April 2013 14:37:41 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:28 UTC