- From: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 12:31:13 -0700
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
Hi, I just want to check back. Are there any updates on animating basic shapes? If I can help, let me know. Greetings, Dirk On Nov 13, 2012, at 7:23 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote: >> CSS Masking allows animation of the 'clip-path' property[1]. This is an requirement from SVG which introduces this property. >> >> CSS Masking also extends this property to use the Basic Shapes from CSS Exclusions[2]. I would like to have interpolation of basic shapes to be defined. This could be used for some neat effects on CSS Transitions. I would suggest wording like this in the spec: > [...] >> Interpolation of basic shapes >> --------------------------------------- >> >> If a host specification allows animations or transitions on basic shapes, the basic shapes must be interpolated. For interpolating between one basic shape and a second, the rules described below are applied. >> >> • If both basic shapes are of the same type and not of type polygon: >> • Interpolate between each value. >> • If one basic shape is of type rectangle and the second of type circle or ellipse: >> • Replace the circle/ellipse with a temporary rectangle of equal dimension. >> • Set the values for rx and ry on the temporary rectangle to ‘50%’. >> • Interpolate between the two rectangles as above. >> • If both basic shapes are of type polygon and if both polygons have the same number of vertices: >> • Interpolate between each value. >> • In all other cases: >> • No interpolation is specified. > > Sounds good to me. Be more specific in the spec about what "equal > dimension" means for the rectangle/circle matchup. It's obvious, but > you need to spell that out. > > ~TJ
Received on Friday, 5 April 2013 19:31:41 UTC