- From: irfan mir <theirf@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 01:53:37 -0400
- To: Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAMPj_RoJcTXvkpsnhOejKJdkewnf+7=bs431fX0cy87zBPAP8A@mail.gmail.com>
Ah, looks like I forgot the other prefixes and unprefixed version of that property. Thank you for pointing that out. Regards, Irfan. On Mar 27, 2013 3:59 PM, "Daniel Holbert" <dholbert@mozilla.com> wrote: > (Also, for the old-flexbox syntax: you have -webkit-box-orient there, > but no corresponding -moz/-ms/unprefixed version for that property. I > imagine you wanted to include those?) > > On 03/27/2013 12:46 PM, Daniel Holbert wrote: > > One correction: there's no need to use "-moz-" prefixing for any of the > > current-flexbox keywords & property-names. > > > > Mozilla has shifted away from vendor-prefixing, for a variety of > > reasons. Instead, we're shipping work-in-progress CSS features > > unprefixed, but behind about:config prefs (which are disabled by default > > until the spec and implementation are sufficiently stable & complete). > > > > So: the "new" flexbox spec's keywords are all unprefixed in Mozilla > > code, though they're still disabled by default in our release builds. > > (But it should be enabled by default soon.[1]) > > > > (Technically, we did actually ship one old release (Firefox 18) with > > *both* the pref and with prefixed flexbox keywords & properties -- but > > the number of users on that out-of-date release who've refused/disabled > > automatic updates and who've *also* manually toggled the flexbox-support > > pref should be extremely low -- likely zero. That's the set of users > > you'd be targeting with -moz-prefixed new-flexbox keywords markup, and > > IMHO it's not worth it. :)) > > > > ~Daniel > > > > [1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=841876 > > > > > > On 03/27/2013 10:18 AM, irfan mir wrote: > >> Hello CSS Working Group, > >> > >> I've been playing with flexbox recently now that the syntax is stable > >> and am just wondering if the syntax I used is proper for maximum > >> support. I would use a Javascript ployfill, but there isn't one for the > >> new syntax yet. So, in order to get maximum support, I am using the old > >> syntax and current syntax. > >> > >> Please correct me if I am doing anything wrong. I am trying to get > >> maximum support in all the browser that at some point supported some > >> version of the flexbox module. > >> > >> /*2009 syntax*/ > >> display:-moz-box; > >> display:-ms-box; > >> display:-webkit-box; > >> display:box; > >> -webkit-box-orient:vertical; > >> /*current syntax*/ > >> display:-moz-flex; > >> display:-ms-flex; > >> display:-webkit-flex; > >> display:flex; > >> -moz-flex-direction:column; > >> -ms-flex-direction:column; > >> -webkit-flex-direction:column; > >> flex-direction:column; > >> > >> Thanks in Advance & Best Regards, > >> Irfan Mir. > > >
Received on Wednesday, 3 April 2013 05:54:06 UTC