- From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 18:08:05 -0400
- To: Garrett Smith <dhtmlkitchen@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Henrik Andersson <henke@henke37.cjb.net>, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, "alice.lieutier@gmail.com" <alice.lieutier@gmail.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, 2013-04-01 at 12:53 -0700, Garrett Smith wrote: > On 4/1/13, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > > Please don't feed the troll. > > > Somebody here *really* needs a pony. I can give you a unicorn - e.g. [1]. I prefer the constant-time scrolling to the constant speed, because I'm impatient. Actually a compromise might be be constant-time with a fade-in/fade-out lacuna if the speed would need to be too great. But... since it's clear that scrolling experiments can be done with JavaScript and since it seems there's not consensus on what's wanted, isn't it too early to put it into CSS? Liam [1] http://www.fromoldbooks.org/Jameson-SacredAndLegendaryArt-VolII/pages/577-detail-unicorn/ -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/ Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml
Received on Monday, 1 April 2013 22:08:10 UTC